Belgiumin Maps

Official Belgian data, explained

Recharging points — 7.4–22 kW AC by district in Belgium (2021)

This page maps Recharging points — 7.4–22 kW AC for one nationally comparable 2021 slice. Every figure below uses the same disclosed definition, unit, geography and source.

Society

What this indicator measures

Recharging points per power category by NUTS 3 region - experimental statistics. Complete annual Eurostat source dimensions, units and observation flags are retained in one compact cube.

Recharging points per power category by NUTS 3 region - experimental statistics. Recharging points per power category by NUTS 3 region - experimental statistics. Complete annual Eurostat source dimensions, units and observation flags are retained in one compact cube.

Indicator dossier

Data passport

Selected reference period
2021
Geography
administrative districts
Measure
Recharging points per power category by NUTS 3 region - experimental statistics
Unit
count
Comparable areas
42
Coverage
97.7%

Indicator dossier

Selected slice

Exact catalogue filters applied to the map, statistics and comparison.

Charging power
Alternating current - ≤ 7,4 kW but ≤ 22 kW (medium-speed, triple-phase)

Latest published slice

How to read the pattern

Median
138count
Unweighted area mean
247.52count
Minimum
9count
Maximum
1,288count

Across the valid national comparison set, the median is 138 count. Values extend from 9 to 1,288 count. This describes geographic variation; it is not a score of local quality.

Geography

Map of Belgium

Recharging points — 7.4–22 kW AC, 2021. Exact official boundaries; missing values remain neutral.
  1. 9–37.69 areas
  2. 37.6–918 areas
  3. 91–201.68 areas
  4. 201.6–471.68 areas
  5. 471.6–1,2889 areas
Recharging points — 7.4–22 kW AC, 2021. Exact official boundaries; missing values remain neutral.

Categories

Distribution by official map class

Distribution by official map classOne bar per catalogue-owned map class. The x-axis is the indicator value range; bar height is the number of areas.99–37.6837.6–91891–201.68201.6–471.69471.6–1,288LowerHigher
One bar per catalogue-owned map class. The x-axis is the indicator value range; bar height is the number of areas.
ValueAreasCategories
9–37.69
37.6–918
91–201.68
201.6–471.68
471.6–1,2889

Explore this exact slice in the atlas

administrative districts

Highest and lowest values

From 42 comparable areas, the table shows a concise descriptive high-and-low sample. Equal values do not imply equal local circumstances.

Highest and lowest values
Position#AreaOfficial codeValue
Highest1Arrondissement Antwerpen110001,288 count
Highest2Arrondissement Gent440001,064 count
Highest3Arrondissement Halle-Vilvoorde23000743 count
Highest4Arrondissement Turnhout13000601 count
Highest5Arrondissement Hasselt71000580 count
Highest6Arrondissement Kortrijk34000557 count
Highest7Arrondissement Leuven24000542 count
Highest8Arrondissement Brugge31000511 count
Highest9Arrondissement Mechelen12000479 count
Highest10Arrondissement de Bruxelles-Capitale21000442 count
Lowest42Arrondissement de Virton850009 count
Lowest41Arrondissement de Thuin5600014 count
Lowest40Arrondissement d’Arlon8100016 count
Lowest39Arrondissement de La Louvière5800018 count
Lowest38Arrondissement de Waremme6400025 count
Lowest37Arrondissement de Philippeville9300027 count
Lowest36Arrondissement de Bastogne8200030 count
Lowest35Arrondissement de Soignies5500034 count
Lowest34Arrondissement d’Ath5100037 count
Lowest33Arrondissement de Neufchâteau8400040 count

Method and limitations

Method and limitations

No missing value is imputed. Classification breaks and colours come from the catalogue, and source-declared suppression remains missing.

The area mean gives every published geographic area equal weight. It is not weighted by population, exposure or area size.

Native NUTS3 value mapped only to exact district geography; not a municipality value. Selectors define the source universe and unit.

Default-filter coverage on exact native geography. Verviers is intentionally unavailable for NUTS-3 datasets because the two source parts are never generically rolled up.

Read the methodology

Sources, licence and provenance

Sources, licence and provenance

Sources, licence and provenance