Belgiumin Maps

Official Belgian data, explained

Party fragmentation by municipality in Belgium (2024)

This page maps Party fragmentation for one nationally comparable 2024 slice. Every figure below uses the same disclosed definition, unit, geography and source.

Elections

What this indicator measures

Rae fractionalisation: one minus the sum of squared valid-vote shares across reviewed party families, times 100.

Party fragmentation. Rae fractionalisation: one minus the sum of squared valid-vote shares across reviewed party families, times 100.

Indicator dossier

Data passport

Selected reference period
2024
Geography
municipalities
Measure
Party fragmentation
Unit
%
Comparable areas
581
Coverage
100%

Latest published slice

How to read the pattern

Median
80.3%
Unweighted area mean
79.9%
Minimum
61.3%
Maximum
89.6%

Across the valid national comparison set, the median is 80.3 %. Values extend from 61.3 to 89.6 %. This describes geographic variation; it is not a score of local quality.

Geography

Map of Belgium

Party fragmentation, 2024. Exact official boundaries; missing values remain neutral.
  1. 61.3–77.7117 areas
  2. 77.7–79.6113 areas
  3. 79.6–81122 areas
  4. 81–82.5118 areas
  5. 82.5–89.6111 areas
Party fragmentation, 2024. Exact official boundaries; missing values remain neutral.

Categories

Distribution by official map class

Distribution by official map classOne bar per catalogue-owned map class. The x-axis is the indicator value range; bar height is the number of areas.11761.3–77.711377.7–79.612279.6–8111881–82.511182.5–89.6LowerHigher
One bar per catalogue-owned map class. The x-axis is the indicator value range; bar height is the number of areas.
ValueAreasCategories
61.3–77.7117
77.7–79.6113
79.6–81122
81–82.5118
82.5–89.6111

Explore this exact slice in the atlas

municipalities

Highest and lowest values

From 581 comparable areas, the table shows a concise descriptive high-and-low sample. Equal values do not imply equal local circumstances.

Highest and lowest values
Position#AreaOfficial codeValue
Highest1Drogenbos2309889.6 %
Highest2Wemmel2310289.4 %
Highest3Linkebeek2310086.7 %
Highest4Jette2101086.6 %
Highest5Bever2300986.5 %
Highest6Wezembeek-Oppem2310386.4 %
Highest7Beersel2300385.8 %
Highest8Ganshoren2100885.6 %
Highest9Berchem-Sainte-Agathe2100385.6 %
Highest10Zaventem2309485.4 %
Lowest581Lasne2511961.3 %
Lowest580Rouvroy8504764.6 %
Lowest579Bièvre9101565.3 %
Lowest578Crisnée6402167.8 %
Lowest577Jalhay6303868.4 %
Lowest576Cerfontaine9301069.3 %
Lowest575Bertrix8400969.3 %
Lowest574Bastogne8200370 %
Lowest573Thimister-Clermont6308970.4 %
Lowest572Libramont-Chevigny8407770.5 %

Method and limitations

Method and limitations

No missing value is imputed. Classification breaks and colours come from the catalogue, and source-declared suppression remains missing.

The area mean gives every published geographic area equal weight. It is not weighted by population, exposure or area size.

Read the methodology

Sources, licence and provenance

Sources, licence and provenance

Sources, licence and provenance