Belgiumin Maps

Official Belgian data, explained

Effective number of parties by municipality in Belgium (2024)

This page maps Effective number of parties for one nationally comparable 2024 slice. Every figure below uses the same disclosed definition, unit, geography and source.

Elections

What this indicator measures

Laakso-Taagepera effective number: 1 divided by the sum of squared valid-vote shares across reviewed party families.

Effective number of parties. Laakso-Taagepera effective number: 1 divided by the sum of squared valid-vote shares across reviewed party families.

Indicator dossier

Data passport

Selected reference period
2024
Geography
municipalities
Measure
Effective number of parties
Unit
parties
Comparable areas
581
Coverage
100%

Latest published slice

How to read the pattern

Median
5.09parties
Unweighted area mean
5.09parties
Minimum
2.58parties
Maximum
9.66parties

Across the valid national comparison set, the median is 5.09 parties. Values extend from 2.58 to 9.66 parties. This describes geographic variation; it is not a score of local quality.

Geography

Map of Belgium

Effective number of parties, 2024. Exact official boundaries; missing values remain neutral.
  1. 2.58–4.48117 areas
  2. 4.48–4.9112 areas
  3. 4.9–5.25120 areas
  4. 5.25–5.7112 areas
  5. 5.7–9.66120 areas
Effective number of parties, 2024. Exact official boundaries; missing values remain neutral.

Categories

Distribution by official map class

Distribution by official map classOne bar per catalogue-owned map class. The x-axis is the indicator value range; bar height is the number of areas.1172.58–4.481124.48–4.91204.9–5.251125.25–5.71205.7–9.66LowerHigher
One bar per catalogue-owned map class. The x-axis is the indicator value range; bar height is the number of areas.
ValueAreasCategories
2.58–4.48117
4.48–4.9112
4.9–5.25120
5.25–5.7112
5.7–9.66120

Explore this exact slice in the atlas

municipalities

Highest and lowest values

From 581 comparable areas, the table shows a concise descriptive high-and-low sample. Equal values do not imply equal local circumstances.

Highest and lowest values
Position#AreaOfficial codeValue
Highest1Drogenbos230989.66 parties
Highest2Wemmel231029.47 parties
Highest3Linkebeek231007.53 parties
Highest4Jette210107.45 parties
Highest5Bever230097.4 parties
Highest6Wezembeek-Oppem231037.37 parties
Highest7Beersel230037.07 parties
Highest8Ganshoren210086.94 parties
Highest9Berchem-Sainte-Agathe210036.92 parties
Highest10Zaventem230946.87 parties
Lowest581Lasne251192.58 parties
Lowest580Rouvroy850472.83 parties
Lowest579Bièvre910152.88 parties
Lowest578Crisnée640213.11 parties
Lowest577Jalhay630383.16 parties
Lowest576Cerfontaine930103.26 parties
Lowest575Bertrix840093.26 parties
Lowest574Bastogne820033.34 parties
Lowest573Thimister-Clermont630893.38 parties
Lowest572Libramont-Chevigny840773.39 parties

Method and limitations

Method and limitations

No missing value is imputed. Classification breaks and colours come from the catalogue, and source-declared suppression remains missing.

The area mean gives every published geographic area equal weight. It is not weighted by population, exposure or area size.

Read the methodology

Sources, licence and provenance

Sources, licence and provenance

Sources, licence and provenance