Official Belgian data, explained

Sex ratio by municipality in Belgium (2026)

This page maps Sex ratio for one nationally comparable 2026 slice. Every figure below uses the same disclosed definition, unit, geography and source.

Population

What this indicator measures

Men divided by women × 100.

Official Statbel measure for Sex ratio.

Indicator dossier

Data passport

Selected reference period
2026
Geography
municipalities
Boundary set
Statistical sectors 2026
Measure
Ratio
Unit
per 100 women
Comparable areas
565
Coverage
100%

Latest published slice

How to read the pattern

Median
97.7per 100 women
Unweighted area mean
97.7per 100 women
Minimum
85.9per 100 women
Maximum
112per 100 women

Across the valid national comparison set, the median is 97.7 per 100 women. Values extend from 85.9 to 112 per 100 women. This describes geographic variation; it is not a score of local quality.

Geography

Map of Belgium

Sex ratio, 2026. Catalogue-owned colour classes are drawn on exact official boundaries; missing values remain neutral.
  1. 82.9–94.899 areas
  2. 94.8–96.8110 areas
  3. 96.8–98.3123 areas
  4. 98.3–100.1125 areas
  5. 100.1–151.6108 areas
Sex ratio, 2026. Catalogue-owned colour classes are drawn on exact official boundaries; missing values remain neutral.

Areas

Value distribution

Value distributionHistogram of published values. The x-axis is the actual indicator value; bar height is the number of areas. The line marks the median.0459085.9–87: 1 area87–88.1: 2 areas88.1–89.2: 3 areas89.2–90.3: 2 areas90.3–91.4: 4 areas91.4–92.5: 15 areas92.5–93.5: 15 areas93.5–94.6: 50 areas94.6–95.7: 52 areas95.7–96.8: 66 areas96.8–97.9: 90 areas97.9–99: 86 areas99–100.1: 71 areas100.1–101.2: 41 areas101.2–102.2: 25 areas102.2–103.3: 21 areas103.3–104.4: 7 areas104.4–105.5: 3 areas105.5–106.6: 4 areas106.6–107.7: 2 areas107.7–108.8: 2 areas108.8–109.9: 1 area109.9–111: 1 area111–112: 1 areaMedian · 97.785.9112per 100 womenNumber of areas
Histogram of published values. The x-axis is the actual indicator value; bar height is the number of areas. The line marks the median.
ValueAreas
85.9–871
87–88.12
88.1–89.23
89.2–90.32
90.3–91.44
91.4–92.515
92.5–93.515
93.5–94.650
94.6–95.752
95.7–96.866
96.8–97.990
97.9–9986
99–100.171
100.1–101.241
101.2–102.225
102.2–103.321
103.3–104.47
104.4–105.53
105.5–106.64
106.6–107.72
107.7–108.82
108.8–109.91
109.9–1111
111–1121

Explore this exact slice in the atlas Download this data as CSV

municipalities

Highest and lowest values

From 565 comparable areas, the table shows a concise descriptive high-and-low sample. Equal values do not imply equal local circumstances.

Highest and lowest values
Highest1Vresse-sur-Semois91143112 per 100 women
Highest2Herstappe73028110.8 per 100 women
Highest3Saint-Josse-ten-Noode21014109.7 per 100 women
Highest4Herbeumont84029108.6 per 100 women
Highest5Hastière91142108.3 per 100 women
Highest6Houffalize82014107 per 100 women
Highest7Bullange63012106.7 per 100 women
Highest8Faimes64076106.3 per 100 women
Highest9Vleteren33041106.2 per 100 women
Highest10Baarle-Hertog13002105.9 per 100 women
Lowest565Watermael-Boitsfort2101785.9 per 100 women
Lowest564Uccle2101687 per 100 women
Lowest563Woluwe-Saint-Lambert2101887.2 per 100 women
Lowest562Woluwe-Saint-Pierre2101988.5 per 100 women
Lowest561Fléron6203889.1 per 100 women
Lowest560Montigny-le-Tilleul5204889.2 per 100 women
Lowest559Waterloo2511089.9 per 100 women
Lowest558Waremme6407490.1 per 100 women
Lowest557Drogenbos2309890.3 per 100 women
Lowest556Nivelles2507290.6 per 100 women

Method and limitations

Method and limitations

No missing value is imputed. Where colour classes are used, their breaks and colours come from the catalogue; source-declared suppression remains missing.

The area mean gives every published geographic area equal weight. It is not weighted by population, exposure or area size.

Reference population on 1 January.

Read the methodology

Sources, licence and provenance

Sources, licence and provenance

Sources, licence and provenance