Belgiumin Maps

Official Belgian data, explained

Administrative income coverage by municipality in Belgium (2023)

This page maps Administrative income coverage for one nationally comparable 2023 slice. Every figure below uses the same disclosed definition, unit, geography and source.

Income

What this indicator measures

Persons included or not included in the administrative-income population.

Share not eligible. Persons included or not included in the administrative-income population.

Indicator dossier

Data passport

Selected reference period
2023
Geography
municipalities
Measure
Share not eligible
Unit
%
Comparable areas
580
Coverage
99.8%

Latest published slice

How to read the pattern

Median
1.3%
Unweighted area mean
1.6%
Minimum
0.5%
Maximum
12.9%

Across the valid national comparison set, the median is 1.3 %. Values extend from 0.5 to 12.9 %. This describes geographic variation; it is not a score of local quality.

Geography

Map of Belgium

Administrative income coverage, 2023. Exact official boundaries; missing values remain neutral.
  1. 0.3–0.998 areas
  2. 0.9–1.2141 areas
  3. 1.2–1.4101 areas
  4. 1.4–2129 areas
  5. 2–16.7111 areas
Administrative income coverage, 2023. Exact official boundaries; missing values remain neutral.

Categories

Distribution by official map class

Distribution by official map classOne bar per catalogue-owned map class. The x-axis is the indicator value range; bar height is the number of areas.980.3–0.91410.9–1.21011.2–1.41291.4–21112–16.7LowerHigher
One bar per catalogue-owned map class. The x-axis is the indicator value range; bar height is the number of areas.
ValueAreasCategories
0.3–0.998
0.9–1.2141
1.2–1.4101
1.4–2129
2–16.7111

Explore this exact slice in the atlas

municipalities

Highest and lowest values

From 580 comparable areas, the table shows a concise descriptive high-and-low sample. Equal values do not imply equal local circumstances.

Highest and lowest values
Position#AreaOfficial codeValue
Highest1Ixelles2100912.9 %
Highest2Etterbeek2100510.5 %
Highest3Saint-Gilles210139.1 %
Highest4Leuven240628.8 %
Highest4Aubange810048.8 %
Highest6Bruxelles210048.3 %
Highest7Martelange810137.9 %
Highest8Saint-Josse-ten-Noode210147.8 %
Highest9Woluwe-Saint-Lambert210187.4 %
Highest9Arlon810017.4 %
Lowest575Ham710690.5 %
Lowest575Ruiselede370120.5 %
Lowest575Hooglede360060.5 %
Lowest575Zemst230960.5 %
Lowest575Meerhout130210.5 %
Lowest575Hulshout130160.5 %
Lowest565Remicourt640630.6 %
Lowest565Oreye640560.6 %
Lowest565Anthisnes610790.6 %
Lowest565Lichtervelde360110.6 %

Method and limitations

Method and limitations

No missing value is imputed. Classification breaks and colours come from the catalogue, and source-declared suppression remains missing.

The area mean gives every published geographic area equal weight. It is not weighted by population, exposure or area size.

Municipality-only: published poverty rates and income quantiles cannot be validly reconstructed for parent areas from municipal percentages or quantiles.

Read the methodology

Sources, licence and provenance

Sources, licence and provenance

Sources, licence and provenance