Belgiumin Maps

Official Belgian data, explained

Share: Administrative monetary poverty risk by municipality in Belgium (2023)

This page maps Share: Administrative monetary poverty risk for one nationally comparable 2023 slice. Every figure below uses the same disclosed definition, unit, geography and source.

Income

What this indicator measures

Statbel administrative poverty-risk estimate by 2019 municipality code.

Monetary poverty risk. Statbel administrative poverty-risk estimate by 2019 municipality code.

Indicator dossier

Data passport

Selected reference period
2023
Geography
municipalities
Measure
Monetary poverty risk
Unit
%
Comparable areas
580
Coverage
99.8%

Latest published slice

How to read the pattern

Median
7%
Unweighted area mean
8.2%
Minimum
3.4%
Maximum
32.8%

Across the valid national comparison set, the median is 7 %. Values extend from 3.4 to 32.8 %. This describes geographic variation; it is not a score of local quality.

Geography

Map of Belgium

Share: Administrative monetary poverty risk, 2023. Exact official boundaries; missing values remain neutral.
  1. 3.1–5.6164 areas
  2. 5.6–6.9120 areas
  3. 6.9–8.6107 areas
  4. 8.6–11.6102 areas
  5. 11.6–42.687 areas
Share: Administrative monetary poverty risk, 2023. Exact official boundaries; missing values remain neutral.

Categories

Distribution by official map class

Distribution by official map classOne bar per catalogue-owned map class. The x-axis is the indicator value range; bar height is the number of areas.1643.1–5.61205.6–6.91076.9–8.61028.6–11.68711.6–42.6LowerHigher
One bar per catalogue-owned map class. The x-axis is the indicator value range; bar height is the number of areas.
ValueAreasCategories
3.1–5.6164
5.6–6.9120
6.9–8.6107
8.6–11.6102
11.6–42.687

Explore this exact slice in the atlas

municipalities

Highest and lowest values

From 580 comparable areas, the table shows a concise descriptive high-and-low sample. Equal values do not imply equal local circumstances.

Highest and lowest values
Position#AreaOfficial codeValue
Highest1Saint-Josse-ten-Noode2101432.8 %
Highest2Molenbeek-Saint-Jean2101231.3 %
Highest3Anderlecht2100128 %
Highest4Koekelberg2101126.2 %
Highest5Schaerbeek2101526 %
Highest6Charleroi5201124.4 %
Highest7Bruxelles2100424.3 %
Highest8Dison6302024.1 %
Highest9Saint-Gilles2101323.7 %
Highest10Liège6206323.5 %
Lowest579Zemst230963.4 %
Lowest579Galmaarden230233.4 %
Lowest576Horebeke450623.5 %
Lowest576Rotselaar240943.5 %
Lowest576Herne230323.5 %
Lowest574Hoegaarden240413.6 %
Lowest574Begijnendijk240073.6 %
Lowest570De Pinte440123.7 %
Lowest570Zedelgem310403.7 %
Lowest570Holsbeek240433.7 %

Method and limitations

Method and limitations

No missing value is imputed. Classification breaks and colours come from the catalogue, and source-declared suppression remains missing.

The area mean gives every published geographic area equal weight. It is not weighted by population, exposure or area size.

Municipality-only: published poverty rates and income quantiles cannot be validly reconstructed for parent areas from municipal percentages or quantiles.

Read the methodology

Sources, licence and provenance

Sources, licence and provenance

Sources, licence and provenance