Belgiumin Maps

Official Belgian data, explained

Income interquartile coefficient by municipality in Belgium (2023)

This page maps Income interquartile coefficient for one nationally comparable 2023 slice. Every figure below uses the same disclosed definition, unit, geography and source.

Income

What this indicator measures

Income interquartile coefficient

Official Statbel measure for Income interquartile coefficient.

Value. Published Statbel interquartile dispersion coefficient.

Indicator dossier

Data passport

Selected reference period
2023
Geography
municipalities
Measure
Value
Unit
%
Comparable areas
581
Coverage
100%

Latest published slice

How to read the pattern

Median
99.6%
Unweighted area mean
101.5%
Minimum
73.5%
Maximum
147.5%

Across the valid national comparison set, the median is 99.6 %. Values extend from 73.5 to 147.5 %. This describes geographic variation; it is not a score of local quality.

Geography

Map of Belgium

Income interquartile coefficient, 2023. Exact official boundaries; missing values remain neutral.
  1. 73–94140 areas
  2. 94–99128 areas
  3. 99–104121 areas
  4. 104–11294 areas
  5. 112–15198 areas
Income interquartile coefficient, 2023. Exact official boundaries; missing values remain neutral.

Categories

Distribution by official map class

Distribution by official map classOne bar per catalogue-owned map class. The x-axis is the indicator value range; bar height is the number of areas.14073–9412894–9912199–10494104–11298112–151LowerHigher
One bar per catalogue-owned map class. The x-axis is the indicator value range; bar height is the number of areas.
ValueAreasCategories
73–94140
94–99128
99–104121
104–11294
112–15198

Explore this exact slice in the atlas

municipalities

Highest and lowest values

From 581 comparable areas, the table shows a concise descriptive high-and-low sample. Equal values do not imply equal local circumstances.

Highest and lowest values
Position#AreaOfficial codeValue
Highest1Kraainem23099147.5 %
Highest2Herstappe73028143.8 %
Highest3Wezembeek-Oppem23103139.7 %
Highest4Tervuren24104138.7 %
Highest5Lasne25119138.1 %
Highest6Sint-Martens-Latem44064135.3 %
Highest7Chaumont-Gistoux25018134.6 %
Highest8Overijse23062132 %
Highest9Sint-Genesius-Rode23101131.7 %
Highest10Chastre25117131.5 %
Lowest581Mesen3301673.5 %
Lowest580Farciennes5201874.4 %
Lowest579Châtelet5201276.1 %
Lowest578Quaregnon5306576.7 %
Lowest577Colfontaine5308277.8 %
Lowest576Hastière9114278.3 %
Lowest575Charleroi5201178.4 %
Lowest574Viroinval9309079.2 %
Lowest573Boussu5301479.2 %
Lowest572Saint-Nicolas6209380.6 %

Method and limitations

Method and limitations

No missing value is imputed. Classification breaks and colours come from the catalogue, and source-declared suppression remains missing.

The area mean gives every published geographic area equal weight. It is not weighted by population, exposure or area size.

Income year: the calendar year in which the taxable income was earned.

Read the methodology

Sources, licence and provenance

Sources, licence and provenance

Sources, licence and provenance